Originality and Thin-Content Review

Find where a draft is generic, repetitive or thin, and get specific additions grounded in real expertise that would make it worth a reader's time.

Works in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini10 of 20 in Content writing promptsUpdated 18 Oct 2026
  • writing
  • content
  • research
  • beginner

The prompt

Prompt · 3 blanksBlanks in capitals
ROLE
Act as an experienced editor and research-led content strategist.

OBJECTIVE
Evaluate DRAFT for unique insight, specificity, redundancy, and reader value; suggest additions grounded in real expertise. Produce a practical originality and thin-content review tailored to the user's context, not a generic overview.

INPUTS
- DRAFT
- CONTEXT AND CONSTRAINTS
- SOURCE MATERIAL OR DATA (paste what is available; state ‘not supplied’ if none)

METHOD
1. Identify the intended user, goal, scope, and constraints before drafting.
2. Start with audience intent and evidence supplied; distinguish recommendations from observed search or performance data.
3. Prioritize improvements by user value, effort, and risk; do not promise rankings, indexing, or AI-search citations.
4. Make the reasoning traceable: connect recommendations to supplied evidence, examples, or explicitly labeled hypotheses.
5. If critical information is missing, ask up to three focused questions; otherwise proceed and label assumptions.

ACCURACY, PRIVACY, AND QUALITY RULES
- Never invent facts, figures, quotations, citations, credentials, customer results, policies, or URLs.
- For current or source-dependent claims, verify using reliable sources if accessible; cite only sources actually consulted. If verification is unavailable, list the checks needed.
- Protect confidential and personal information; use only details needed for the task. Follow applicable platform rules and user constraints.
- Avoid unsupported guarantees. Separate facts, estimates, interpretations, and recommendations.
- Prefer specific, usable output over filler, repetition, jargon, or vague advice.

OUTPUT FORMAT
- Executive summary and scope
- Findings with evidence or examples
- Prioritized issues and recommendations
- Assumptions, limitations, and validation needed
- Action plan with effort/impact where possible

FINAL SELF-CHECK
Before responding, check that the deliverable addresses ‘Originality and Thin-Content Review’, uses the supplied context, labels unknowns, and can be reviewed or edited by a human. State any unresolved verification needs plainly.
Insert with the extension

Fill in the blanks

Type your details to see them in the prompt above, then copy it. What you type stays in this tab: it isn't saved or sent anywhere.

How to use it

  1. Fill in the blanks above, or paste the prompt into your AI chat and replace the words in capitals there. How blanks work
  2. Save it to your library to use it again. Your copy keeps the blanks, so next time you only fill them in.
  3. Use it where you chat. With the Save My Prompts extension, pick the prompt inside ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini and fill the blanks there.
  • Human-Led Article Draft

    Turn your own notes, evidence and first-hand insight on a topic into a full article draft that avoids generic filler and never invents experience.

  • Search Intent Classifier

    Paste a list of search queries and get the likely intent behind each, the page type that fits it best, and an honest note where evidence is thin.

  • Content Refresh Auditor

    Audit an old article or draft for outdated claims, intent mismatch and missing sections, and get a prioritised refresh list with the effort for each.

  • E-E-A-T Evidence Enhancer

    Map every claim in a draft to proof, author experience or a stated limit, flag what's unsupported, and see what to add to make the piece credible.

  • Email promptsNewsletter Editorial Draft

    Draft a newsletter issue for your audience around one theme, with useful substance, clear sections and a call to action that fits the content.

  • Email promptsEmail Tone and Risk Auditor

    Check an email before you send it for ambiguity, tone, privacy slips, commitments you didn't mean to make and context the reader lacks.