Originality and Thin-Content Review
Find where a draft is generic, repetitive or thin, and get specific additions grounded in real expertise that would make it worth a reader's time.
- writing
- content
- research
- beginner
The prompt
ROLE Act as an experienced editor and research-led content strategist. OBJECTIVE Evaluate DRAFT for unique insight, specificity, redundancy, and reader value; suggest additions grounded in real expertise. Produce a practical originality and thin-content review tailored to the user's context, not a generic overview. INPUTS - DRAFT - CONTEXT AND CONSTRAINTS - SOURCE MATERIAL OR DATA (paste what is available; state ‘not supplied’ if none) METHOD 1. Identify the intended user, goal, scope, and constraints before drafting. 2. Start with audience intent and evidence supplied; distinguish recommendations from observed search or performance data. 3. Prioritize improvements by user value, effort, and risk; do not promise rankings, indexing, or AI-search citations. 4. Make the reasoning traceable: connect recommendations to supplied evidence, examples, or explicitly labeled hypotheses. 5. If critical information is missing, ask up to three focused questions; otherwise proceed and label assumptions. ACCURACY, PRIVACY, AND QUALITY RULES - Never invent facts, figures, quotations, citations, credentials, customer results, policies, or URLs. - For current or source-dependent claims, verify using reliable sources if accessible; cite only sources actually consulted. If verification is unavailable, list the checks needed. - Protect confidential and personal information; use only details needed for the task. Follow applicable platform rules and user constraints. - Avoid unsupported guarantees. Separate facts, estimates, interpretations, and recommendations. - Prefer specific, usable output over filler, repetition, jargon, or vague advice. OUTPUT FORMAT - Executive summary and scope - Findings with evidence or examples - Prioritized issues and recommendations - Assumptions, limitations, and validation needed - Action plan with effort/impact where possible FINAL SELF-CHECK Before responding, check that the deliverable addresses ‘Originality and Thin-Content Review’, uses the supplied context, labels unknowns, and can be reviewed or edited by a human. State any unresolved verification needs plainly.
Fill in the blanks
Type your details to see them in the prompt above, then copy it. What you type stays in this tab: it isn't saved or sent anywhere.
How to use it
- Fill in the blanks above, or paste the prompt into your AI chat and replace the words in capitals there. How blanks work
- Save it to your library to use it again. Your copy keeps the blanks, so next time you only fill them in.
- Use it where you chat. With the Save My Prompts extension, pick the prompt inside ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini and fill the blanks there.
Related prompts
- Human-Led Article Draft
Turn your own notes, evidence and first-hand insight on a topic into a full article draft that avoids generic filler and never invents experience.
- Search Intent Classifier
Paste a list of search queries and get the likely intent behind each, the page type that fits it best, and an honest note where evidence is thin.
- Content Refresh Auditor
Audit an old article or draft for outdated claims, intent mismatch and missing sections, and get a prioritised refresh list with the effort for each.
- E-E-A-T Evidence Enhancer
Map every claim in a draft to proof, author experience or a stated limit, flag what's unsupported, and see what to add to make the piece credible.
- Email promptsNewsletter Editorial Draft
Draft a newsletter issue for your audience around one theme, with useful substance, clear sections and a call to action that fits the content.
- Email promptsEmail Tone and Risk Auditor
Check an email before you send it for ambiguity, tone, privacy slips, commitments you didn't mean to make and context the reader lacks.