Fact-Checking and Source Audit
Check a draft claim by claim against the sources you paste, and get each one marked supported, partly supported, unsupported or needing a recheck.
- writing
- content
- research
- intermediate
The prompt
ROLE Act as an experienced editor and research-led content strategist. OBJECTIVE Check DRAFT claim by claim against SOURCES and return supported, partly supported, unsupported, or needs-current-check statuses. Produce a practical fact-checking and source audit tailored to the user's context, not a generic overview. INPUTS - DRAFT - SOURCES - CONTEXT AND CONSTRAINTS - SOURCE MATERIAL OR DATA (paste what is available; state ‘not supplied’ if none) METHOD 1. Identify the intended user, goal, scope, and constraints before drafting. 2. Create a claim/evidence table with source, date or recency where available, confidence, and unresolved gaps. 3. Prioritize primary or authoritative sources; never fabricate a citation or imply you opened a source you could not inspect. 4. Make the reasoning traceable: connect recommendations to supplied evidence, examples, or explicitly labeled hypotheses. 5. If critical information is missing, ask up to three focused questions; otherwise proceed and label assumptions. ACCURACY, PRIVACY, AND QUALITY RULES - Never invent facts, figures, quotations, citations, credentials, customer results, policies, or URLs. - For current or source-dependent claims, verify using reliable sources if accessible; cite only sources actually consulted. If verification is unavailable, list the checks needed. - Protect confidential and personal information; use only details needed for the task. Follow applicable platform rules and user constraints. - Avoid unsupported guarantees. Separate facts, estimates, interpretations, and recommendations. - Prefer specific, usable output over filler, repetition, jargon, or vague advice. OUTPUT FORMAT - Executive summary and scope - Findings with evidence or examples - Prioritized issues and recommendations - Assumptions, limitations, and validation needed - Action plan with effort/impact where possible FINAL SELF-CHECK Before responding, check that the deliverable addresses ‘Fact-Checking and Source Audit’, uses the supplied context, labels unknowns, and can be reviewed or edited by a human. State any unresolved verification needs plainly.
Fill in the blanks
Type your details to see them in the prompt above, then copy it. What you type stays in this tab: it isn't saved or sent anywhere.
How to use it
- Fill in the blanks above, or paste the prompt into your AI chat and replace the words in capitals there. How blanks work
- Save it to your library to use it again. Your copy keeps the blanks, so next time you only fill them in.
- Use it where you chat. With the Save My Prompts extension, pick the prompt inside ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini and fill the blanks there.
Related prompts
- Content Refresh Auditor
Audit an old article or draft for outdated claims, intent mismatch and missing sections, and get a prioritised refresh list with the effort for each.
- E-E-A-T Evidence Enhancer
Map every claim in a draft to proof, author experience or a stated limit, flag what's unsupported, and see what to add to make the piece credible.
- Research-Backed Article Planner
Plan an article before you write it: a claim-and-evidence table with sources, confidence and gaps, plus a phased plan for drafting and review.
- Citation and Attribution Assistant
Find every place a draft needs a source or attribution, with the kind of reliable source to look for. It never invents references or quotations.
- Email promptsCold Outreach Email
Write a first-touch email to a type of recipient using your context, honest claims and an easy ask, plus the facts to check before you send it.
- Social media promptsSocial Analytics Performance Auditor
Paste your post metrics and get them read against your goals, formats and sample size, with real patterns kept apart from claims about causes.