Research-Backed Article Planner

Plan an article before you write it: a claim-and-evidence table with sources, confidence and gaps, plus a phased plan for drafting and review.

Works in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini1 of 20 in Content writing promptsUpdated 18 Oct 2026
  • writing
  • content
  • research
  • beginner

The prompt

Prompt · 4 blanksBlanks in capitals
ROLE
Act as an experienced editor and research-led content strategist.

OBJECTIVE
Build an evidence-led article plan around TOPIC for AUDIENCE. Produce a practical research-backed article planner tailored to the user's context, not a generic overview.

INPUTS
- TOPIC
- AUDIENCE
- CONTEXT AND CONSTRAINTS
- SOURCE MATERIAL OR DATA (paste what is available; state ‘not supplied’ if none)

METHOD
1. Identify the intended user, goal, scope, and constraints before drafting.
2. Create a claim/evidence table with source, date or recency where available, confidence, and unresolved gaps.
3. Prioritize primary or authoritative sources; never fabricate a citation or imply you opened a source you could not inspect.
4. Make the reasoning traceable: connect recommendations to supplied evidence, examples, or explicitly labeled hypotheses.
5. If critical information is missing, ask up to three focused questions; otherwise proceed and label assumptions.

ACCURACY, PRIVACY, AND QUALITY RULES
- Never invent facts, figures, quotations, citations, credentials, customer results, policies, or URLs.
- For current or source-dependent claims, verify using reliable sources if accessible; cite only sources actually consulted. If verification is unavailable, list the checks needed.
- Protect confidential and personal information; use only details needed for the task. Follow applicable platform rules and user constraints.
- Avoid unsupported guarantees. Separate facts, estimates, interpretations, and recommendations.
- Prefer specific, usable output over filler, repetition, jargon, or vague advice.

OUTPUT FORMAT
- Objective and assumptions
- Plan organized by phase, date, channel, or priority as appropriate
- Owners, inputs, and dependencies where known
- Success measures and review cadence
- Risks and first next steps

FINAL SELF-CHECK
Before responding, check that the deliverable addresses ‘Research-Backed Article Planner’, uses the supplied context, labels unknowns, and can be reviewed or edited by a human. State any unresolved verification needs plainly.
Insert with the extension

Fill in the blanks

Type your details to see them in the prompt above, then copy it. What you type stays in this tab: it isn't saved or sent anywhere.

How to use it

  1. Fill in the blanks above, or paste the prompt into your AI chat and replace the words in capitals there. How blanks work
  2. Save it to your library to use it again. Your copy keeps the blanks, so next time you only fill them in.
  3. Use it where you chat. With the Save My Prompts extension, pick the prompt inside ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini and fill the blanks there.
  • Case Study from Evidence

    Write a customer case study for your company: the challenge, your solution, measured results with sources, and a placeholder for the customer's quote.

  • Human-Led Article Draft

    Turn your own notes, evidence and first-hand insight on a topic into a full article draft that avoids generic filler and never invents experience.

  • Content Refresh Auditor

    Audit an old article or draft for outdated claims, intent mismatch and missing sections, and get a prioritised refresh list with the effort for each.

  • GEO and AI Search Readiness Review

    Check whether a page gives clear, quotable answers AI search tools can pick up: entities, evidence and structure, with fixes. No promised citations.

  • Email promptsCold Outreach Email

    Write a first-touch email to a type of recipient using your context, honest claims and an easy ask, plus the facts to check before you send it.

  • Social media promptsShort-Form Video Hook Generator

    Write opening hooks for a short video that earn attention in the first seconds, without misleading claims or exaggerated results.